A Research Report
Ride the
Wave of Health!
ORGANIC AGRICULTURE ENDANGERED
The following excerpts are from Rachel's Environment and
Health Weekly, #583, Environmental Research Foundation,
P.O. Box 5036, Annapolis, MD 21403, Fax (410) 263-8944;
Email: erf@rachel.clark.net If the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has its way, food now known as "organically grown" may be genetically engineered, fertilized with sewage sludge, and/or irradiated with nuclear wastes. On December 16, 1997, USDA unveiled its proposed rule to implement the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990 (OFPA). USDA's proposed rule would legalize practices that are presently unthinkable for organic farmers. All across the country, organic farmers and advocates for organic foods have risen up in protest against USDA's proposal. If USDA prevails, the labeling of "organically grown" foods will become meaningless and consumers will no longer have confidence in the organic food industry. Citizens have until May 1, 1998, to comment on USDA's proposed rule. USDA's proposed rule, not only fails to prohibit sewage sludge, irradiation and genetically engineered organisms in organic farming and processing, it also:
** Fails to strictly forbid animal cannibalism in organically
produced animals (believed to be the leading cause of
transmissible spongiform encephalopathy, like "mad cow" disease). If they became law, these broad, prohibitory regulations would force many U.S. companies and grower associations to refrain from marketing eco-labeled products that they currently produce. In short, this proposed rule does not serve the interests of either American producers or consumers. Given these disturbing developments, citizens need to take steps to protect their shopping and marketing rights. There are several things we can do. First, Everyone can inform themselves by getting additional information about the proposed rule from various web sites. Several are listed below. Second, every citizen can submit comments to USDA to voice their concerns about this rule. Information on how to comment and how to gain access to the rule is also noted below. Third, we need to take steps to protect citizen rights to "boycott" foods so that we can use our shopping dollars to protect the environment. Boycotting is endangered by this proposed regulation. We need to encourage USDA to establish a strong standard for organic food --a rule that supports farmers who are producing food ecologically and customers who choose to buy and eat that food. The existing proposal only supports agribusiness, the same industries that have brought you pesticides and genetically engineered crops.
Frederick Kirschenmann operates a 3100-acre organic farm in North Dakota. He serves on the board of the World Sustainable Agriculture Society and is president of the board of the Henry A. Wallace Institute. He has a Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of Chicago.The proposed USDA rule can be downloaded from; http://www.usda.gov/ams/nop on the world wide web, or you can purchase a paper copy from the FEDERAL REGISTER for $8.00 by calling 202-512-1800 in Washington, D.C. The original comment period was slated to end March 16, but has now been extended to May 1. Comments to USDA on the proposed organic rule should be submitted by May 1 to: Eileen S. Stommes, Deputy Administrator, USDA-AMS-TM-NOP, Room 4007-S, AG Stop 0275, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, D.C. 20090-6456. Comments can also be faxed to 202-690-4632, or E-mailed via the National Organic Program home page at; http://www.usda.gov/ams/nop. Web sites where you can get additional information: http://www.usda/gov/ams/nop| http://www.ccof.org.| http://www.pmac.net/nosrule.htm| http://www.csa-efc.org.
|